Considering the phrase "too much of a good thing is a bad thing",
would the inverse indicate
that too much of a bad thing could indeed be a good thing?
It would most likely be concluded to be a rash rationalisation
for the very beginning-
implies an excess, which in itself connotes negativity.
With that being said,
this apparent negative is already an alternation—
or a negative-
of a postive action, and so any negation of a negative action
would invalidate any reprehensibility.
Right is wrong is wrong,
and wrong is right is wrong.